封面

概况

获取途经

【书名】：The Complexities of Morphology

【作者】：Peter Arkadiev, Francesco Gardani (eds.)

【年份】：2020年

【出版社】：牛津大学出版社

【简介】： 一本最新的形态复杂性研究论文集。

This volume explores the multiple aspects of morphological complexity, investigating primarily whether certain aspects of morphology can be considered more complex than others, and how that complexity can be measured. The book opens with a detailed introduction from the editors that critically assesses the foundational assumptions that inform contemporary approaches to morphological complexity. In the chapters that follow, the volume's expert contributors approach the topic from typological, acquisitional, sociolinguistic, and diachronic perspectives; the concluding chapter offers an overview of these various approaches, with a focus on the minimum description length principle. The analyses are based on rich empirical data from both well-known languages such as Russian and lesser-studied languages from Africa, Australia, and the Americas, as well as experimental data from artificial language learning.

此资源由LingLab合作伙伴“语言学小电”提供，感兴趣可添加“语言学小电”的微信13764179404进行咨询！

【书名】：A Dependency Grammar of English: An Introduction and Beyond

【作者】：Timothy Osborne

【出版社】：John Benjamins出版社

【年份】：2019年

【简介】：Dependency grammar (DG) is an approach to the syntax of natural languages with a long and venerable tradition, yet awareness of its potential to serve as a basis for principled analyses of natural language syntax is minimal due to the predominance of phrase structure grammar (PSG). This book presents a DG of English with two main goals in mind. The first is to make the principles of dependency syntax accessible to a general audience so that the novice linguist as well as the seasoned syntactician becomes fully aware of what makes DG unique as an approach to the study of natural language syntax. The second is to present and develop a version of DG that then serves as a principled basis for the investigation of central areas of the syntax of English, such as long-distance dependencies, coordination, ellipsis, valency, etc. An overarching theme in all this is that DG is simple compared to PSG, yet despite this simplicity, it is quite effective at shedding light on the nature of syntactic phenomena.

此资源由LingLab免费提供，可点击下方的按钮直接获取！